Article written by Rishabh Dev Choudhary under the guidance of Alejandro Velez, former ML and Data Engineer and instructor at Interview Kickstart. Reviewed by Abhinav Rawat, a Senior Product Manager.
In an era where AI tools can generate code, explain algorithms, and even suggest optimizations, it’s reasonable to ask why data structures and algorithms still matter so much in FAANG interviews. It is because FAANG DSA interview questions value reasoning. They are one of the few reliable ways to evaluate how an engineer reasons when automation cannot carry out the thinking for them.
For roles at Meta, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google, performance on DSA problems often outweighs résumé strength or prior brand names. These interviews are not collections of clever puzzles. They are carefully designed evaluations of how you break down ambiguity, reason about constraints, and maintain correctness while details shift and edge cases surface.
The candidate pool for these roles is deep, which raises the standard across every round. Many capable engineers fall short not because they lack experience, but because they approach FAANG DSA interview questions as exercises in recall. Interviewers, however, are looking for structured reasoning, clear mental models, and the ability to explain why a solution works, not just that it works.
FAANG DSA interviews follow a deliberate structure. The intent is not novelty. It is repeatability in evaluation.
Interviewers rely on a stable set of problem types because those problems consistently expose how candidates reason under constraint. Familiar domains allow interviewers to focus on thinking quality rather than problem discovery. Subtle variations in input size, constraints, or follow-up requirements are enough to distinguish levels of understanding.
The emphasis stays on core foundations. Arrays and strings test control over state and indexing. Graphs and trees reveal whether structural relationships are handled precisely. Dynamic programming and recursion surface discipline in managing growing complexity.
Additional signal comes from how candidates use hashing for constant-time access, binary search for feasibility-driven optimization, and heaps when partial ordering matters more than full sorting.
Across companies and interviewers, the same foundations recur. The phrasing changes, but the structure remains the same.
Here is a quick mental model that many reviewers use:
| Area tested | What interviewers infer |
| Arrays and strings | Ability to reason about state changes and indexing |
| Graph logic | Structural reasoning when relationships matter |
| Dynamic programming | Discipline in breaking problems into reusable subproblems |
| Hashing | Instinct for constant time lookup and caching opportunities |
| Search and optimization | Comfort with constraints, feasibility, and tradeoffs |
FAANG DSA interview questions are not presented as abstract pattern exercises. They are framed as concrete problems with specific inputs, outputs, and constraints. What makes them predictable is not their wording, but the underlying structure they test. This section outlines the most common question types that appear across FAANG interviews, grouped by the core patterns they rely on. These are representative of what candidates are actually asked, not simplified practice labels.
Questions related to string and array transformations are common in early interview rounds and are used to test state management, indexing discipline, and boundary handling. The problems are usually constrained to linear or near-linear solutions, making inefficient approaches easy to rule out.
Examples of FAANG-style questions include:
Given a string, find the longest substring that satisfies multiple constraints simultaneously, such as uniqueness plus frequency bounds or weighted costs
Compute the maximum value of a subarray under conditional updates or penalties that change as the window moves
Process interval updates and queries efficiently when intervals overlap heavily and arrive dynamically
Identify minimal transformations required to satisfy ordering or grouping constraints without sorting the entire input
Interviewers use these questions to observe whether candidates reason explicitly about constraints, maintain correct invariants while updating pointers, and handle edge cases such as empty inputs or uniform values. Strong candidates often state the invariant they are preserving before coding, which makes their logic easier to follow and evaluate.
What interviewers watch for here
Good candidates verbalize the invariant they maintain, like “window [l, r] always contains unique characters”. That one sentence makes it easier for the interviewer to trust your pointer updates.
Graph and tree questions at FAANG are rarely isolated traversals. They often combine traversal with ordering, dependency resolution, or state propagation.
Common examples that appear all over FAANG-style interviews are:
The questions test modeling precision. Interviewers evaluate whether candidates can convert real-world constraints into graph structure, choose the correct traversal strategy, and reason about edge cases such as cycles, disconnected components, or deep recursion limits.
Dynamic programming is where FAANG interviews start to separate people who can grind practice sets from those who can reason with complex states.
Typical problem families tend to cluster around a few core patterns.
A quick way to impress here is to say your state and transition explicitly
“Let dp[i] be the best answer up to index i. Then for each j before i that satisfies X, we update dp[i] using dp[j].”
You do not need fancy math. You need a consistent structure.
Dynamic programming questions are not primarily about speed. They are about discipline. Can you keep track of meaning, base cases, and transitions when the state space grows? Many candidates lose points by coding first and only later discovering they do not know what dp[i] actually represents.
Some of the most famous FAANG DSA interview questions do not look like a binary search at first sight. They look like scheduling or capacity planning.
A few representative examples make this clearer.
At first, these read like greedy or simulation problems. The intended pattern is different.
When you say something like, “We cannot binary search the array itself, but we can binary search the range of possible speeds from 1 to max pile size”, reviewers know you have done this before, which is a good signal.
Heaps appear most often in FAANG interviews as tools for online decisions, streaming problems, and scheduling.
Interviewers often return to a familiar set of classic problems.
Find the kth largest element in an unsorted array
Questions in this category are meant to test deeper reasoning skills.
A common pattern: if you catch yourself sorting k lists of total length N every time, you are probably at O(N log N) when you could be using a heap to stay closer to O(N log k).
Interviewers listen for justifications like, “k is much smaller than N, so a heap of size k keeps the cost down”. That is the kind of line that moves you from “can code” to “thinks about performance like a senior”.
Behind the scenes, interviewers fill out a scorecard. Different companies have different forms, but they look surprisingly similar.
They are rarely asking “did the candidate solve the problem” as a single yes or no. They are scoring along several axes
You can think of these as your real “DSA score”. A fully correct solution with a weak explanation can still turn into a “no hire” if communication is confusing or brittle.
Advanced FAANG DSA interview questions tend to stack patterns and push on decision making rather than syntax. These usually appear in later onsite rounds, when interviewers already know you can code.
Below are some of the typical examples
What makes these harder is not a new theory, but the pressure. You must choose the right structure quickly, explain tradeoffs, and avoid dead ends while the interviewer watches.
Most FAANG problems belong to families. The trick is spotting the family early, even when the problem statement hides it behind story details.
Interviewers are testing whether you can map something unfamiliar onto something known.
In practice, this often shows up as problems such as:
Interviewers rarely stop once you reach a working solution. Follow-ups are intentional behavioural tests. An article by Capd.mit.edu1 highlights the importance of demonstrating in-depth knowledge and skill in a behavioural interview.
Some of the most common versions are listed below:
They are watching how you reason, not whether you have the answer ready. Saying “I would need to trade memory for speed here” or “this approach would fail if input size doubled” often scores points even without full reimplementation.
For experienced candidates, the problem is rarely exposure. Most people have already seen the patterns. The real issue is that practice often stops too early, right after a solution works. That kind of preparation feels productive, but does not hold up once the problem changes shape in an interview.
A more effective approach starts by slowing down after the first solution. Pick one problem. Treat it as a reference, not a checkbox. Once you reach a solution, stop thinking about code and start thinking about why this structure worked. What assumption made it valid? What part of the logic would fail if the input doubled, or if ordering changed, or if the constraints tightened?
Then change one condition. Add streaming input. Remove sorting. Force yourself to adjust without restarting from scratch. This is where real preparation happens, because this is where interviews push back.
Speaking out loud matters more than most people expect. Explaining the approach, without code, exposes weak spots fast. If the reasoning collapses once syntax is gone, the understanding was never stable.
You know you own a pattern when you can rebuild it on a whiteboard, explain the trade-offs, and handle a follow-up without panic. That’s the signal interviewers respond to.
One of the biggest errors is solving the problem instead of solving the interview version of the problem. Many candidates jump straight to the optimal solution without first establishing correctness through a simple idea. Interviewers want to hear how you reason your way forward, not just see a polished final answer.
Another common issue is being confused when the first pattern does not fit. FAANG interviews test you for adaptability, and they really value it. If two-pointer logic fails, you should be able to pivot to hashing or a different model quickly. Sticking to a broken approach often signals shallow understanding.
Over-engineering is another trap. Under time pressure, some engineers introduce unnecessary classes or abstractions. This reads as poor prioritization. Simple, direct code usually wins.
Ignoring constraints causes many candidates to waste time. If you never estimate what O(n log n) or O(n²) actually means for the given input size, it is easy to chase the wrong approach for ten minutes.
Finally, candidates often miss interviewer hints. At FAANG, hints are signals. When an interviewer nudges you toward an idea, they are testing whether you can course-correct.
To ground expectations, here is a list of questions that closely resemble what appears in real loops.
Problem Statement: Given an array of integers nums and an integer target, return the indices of the two numbers such that they add up to target. You may assume that each input would have exactly one solution, and you may not use the same element twice. You can return the answer in any order.
Example:
Input: nums = [2, 7, 11, 15], target = 9
Output: [0, 1]
Explanation:
Because nums[0] + nums[1] = 2 + 7 = 9, which matches the target,
we return their indices: [0, 1].
Problem Statement: Given a string s containing just the characters (, ), {, }, [, and ], determine if the input string is valid. An input string is valid if:
Example:
Input: s = “()[]{}”
Output: true
Input: s = “(]”
Output: false
Problem Statement: You are given an array prices where prices[i] is the price of a given stock on the i-th day. You want to maximize your profit by choosing a single day to buy one stock and choosing a different day in the future to sell that stock. Return the maximum profit you can achieve from this transaction. If you cannot achieve any profit, return 0.
Example:
Input: prices = [7, 1, 5, 3, 6, 4]
Output: 5
Explanation:
Buy at price 1 and sell at price 6,
so the maximum profit = 6 − 1 = 5.
Explanation: Buy on day 2 (price = 1) and sell on day 5 (price = 6), profit = 6-1 = 5.
Note that buying on day 2 and selling on day 1 is not allowed because you must buy before you sell.
Problem Statement
Example:
Input: s = “A man, a plan, a canal: Panama”
Output: true
Explanation:
After removing spaces and punctuation and converting to lowercase,
the string becomes “amanaplanacanalpanama”, which reads the same forward and backward.
P
Example:
Input: root = [4, 2, 7, 1, 3, 6, 9]
Output: [4, 7, 2, 9, 6, 3, 1]
Explanation:
The binary tree is inverted by swapping the left and right child of every node,
resulting in a mirror image of the original tree.
Problem
An Anagram is a word or phrase for
Example:
Input: s = “anagram”, t = “nagaram”
Output: true
Input: s = “rat”, t = “car”
Output: false
Problem Statement: Given an array of integers
Example:
Input: nums = [-1, 0, 3, 5, 9, 12], target = 9
Output: 4
Explanation:
The value 9 exists in the array at index 4,
so the result returned is 4.
Problem St
Merge the two lists into one sorted list. The list should be made by spli
Return the head of the merged linked list.
Example:
Input: list1 = [1, 2, 4], list2 = [1, 3, 4]
Output: [1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4]
Explanation:
Both lists are merged into a single sorted list,
preserving all values from both inputs in order.
Problem Statement: Given a
Example:
Input: nums = [-2, 1, -3, 4, -1, 2, 1, -5, 4]
Output: 6
Explanation:
The subarray [4, -1, 2, 1] has the largest sum,
so the maximum subarray sum is 6.
Explanation: The subarray [4,-1,2,1] has the largest sum = 6.
Problem Statem
The product of any prefix or suffix of nums is guaranteed to fit in a 32-bit integer.
Constraint: You must write an algorithm that runs in O(n)
Example:
Input: nums = [1, 2, 3, 4]
Output: [24, 12, 8, 6]
Input: nums = [-1, 1, 0, -3, 3]
Output: [0, 0, 9, 0, 0]
Problem Statement: Given an integer array nu
Notice that the sol
Example:
Input: nums = [-1, 0, 1, 2, -1, -4]
Output: [[-1, -1, 2], [-1, 0, 1]]
Explanation:
nums[0] + nums[1] + nums[2] = (-1) + 0 + 1 = 0
nums[1] + nums[2] + nums[4] = 0 + 1 + (-1) = 0
The distinct triplets that sum to zero are:
[-1, 0, 1] and [-1, -1, 2]
Problem Statement: You are given an integ
Find two lines that together with the x-ax
Return the maximum amount of water a container ca
Example:
Input: nums = [-1, 0, 1, 2, -1, -4]
Output: [[-1, -1, 2], [-1, 0, 1]]
Explanation:
nums[0] + nums[1] + nums[2] = (-1) + 0 + 1 = 0
nums[1] + nums[2] + nums[4] = 0 + 1 + (-1) = 0
The distinct triplets that sum to zero are:
[-1, 0, 1] and [-1, -1, 2]
Explanation: The vertical lines are at index 1 (height 8) and index 8 (height 7).
The width is 8 – 1 = 7. The height is min(8, 7) = 7.
Area = 7 * 7 = 49.
Problem Statement: Given an array of strings s
An Anagram is a
Example:
Input: strs = ["eat","tea","tan","ate","nat","bat"]
Output: [["bat"],["nat","tan"],["ate","eat","tea"]]
Q14. Longest Substring Without Repeating Characters (Most asked question at: Meta/Facebook, Amazon, Apple)
Problem Statement: Given a string s, find the length of the longest substring without repeating characters.
Example:
Input: s = "abcabcbb"
Output: 3
Explanation: The answer is “abc”, with the length of 3.
Problem Statement: Given th
Example:
Input: head = [1,2,3,4,5]
Output: [5,4,3,2,1]
Problem Statement: Given the head of a l
There is a cycle in a linked list if there is some node i
Return true if there is a cycle
Example:
Input: head = [3,2,0,-4], pos = 1 (tail connects to node index 1)
Output: true
Explanation: There is a cycle in the linked list, where the tail connects to the 1st node (0-indexed).
Problem Statement: There is an integer array nums sorted in ascending order (with distinct values). Prior to being passed to your function, nums is possibly rotated at an unknown pivot index k (1 <= k < nums.length).
Given the array nums after the possible rotation and an integer target, return the index of target if it is in nums, or -1 if it is not.
You must write an algorithm with O(log n) runtime complexity.
Example:
Input: nums = [4,5,6,7,0,1,2], target = 0
Output: 4
Problem Statement: Given an integer array nums and an integer k, return the k most frequent elements. You may return the answer in any order.
Example:
Input: nums = [1,1,1,2,2,3], k = 2
Output: [1,2]
Explanation: 1 appears three times, 2 appears two times. They are the top 2 frequent elements.
Problem Statement: Given the root of a binary tree, return its maximum depth.
A binary tree’s maximum depth is the number of nodes along the longest path from the root node down to the farthest leaf node.
Example:
Input: root = [3,9,20,null,null,15,7]
Output: 3
Explanation: Path 3 -> 20 -> 15 (or 7) has 3 nodes.
Problem Statement: Given
Two binary trees are considered the same if they a
Example:
Input: p = [1,2,3], q = [1,2,3]
Output: true
Input: p = [1,2], q = [1,null,2]
Output: false
Let’s take a look at some more frequently asked FAANG DSA interview questions:
FAANG DSA interview questions are not about memorizing answers to the algorithms. The candidates are judged not only on their knowledge of core data structures and algorithms. Additionally, strong communication skills, effective behavioral and problem-solving abilities are essential. It requires a strong approach to break the complex problem using a well-fitted structure and algorithm to get the solution.
Clear FAANG DSA interview with confidence with the Interview Kickstart;s FAANG DSA Coding Masterclass. Learn to solve interval-based LeetCode problems and decode FAANG+ DSA interview patterns. Led by industry experts, get an in-depth understanding of the core data structures and algorithms needed to solve interval-based problems. Grasp interval-based patterns used in top FAANG coding rounds.
FAANG companies are known for it’s innovation, learning curve, handsome package, and work environment. One needs to go through a rigorous interview process to get entry into FAANG.
FAANG DSA interview questions are the real test of core fundamentals and problem solving skills in real time scenarios. They are structured evaluations of discipline, clarity, and the ability to control complexity under pressure. Candidates who focus on patterns, communicate their reasoning, and practice in realistic interview conditions consistently outperform those who try to solve long problem lists.
A well-planned approach towards preparation with consistency is the key. Aspirants should dig deep into forums and other resources to analyze the trends and patterns in DSA interviews. Aspirants should prepare based on the company and job profile.
FAANG companies are known for it’s innovation, learning curve, handsome package, and work.
Yes, data
Yes. FAANG companies fully accept Python for DSA interviews. What
No. DSA is necessary
You can cover DSA basics in
Data Structures alone are generally easier than C
Attend our free webinar to amp up your career and get the salary you deserve.
Time Zone:
100% Free — No credit card needed.
693+ FAANG insiders created a system so you don’t have to guess anymore!
100% Free — No credit card needed.
Time Zone:
Land high-paying DE jobs by enrolling in the most comprehensive DE Interview Prep Course taught by FAANG+ engineers.
Ace the toughest backend interviews with this focused & structured Backend Interview Prep course taught by FAANG+ engineers.
Elevate your engineering career with this interview prep program designed for software engineers with less than 3 years of experience.
Get your enrollment process started by registering for a Pre-enrollment Webinar with one of our Founders.
Time Zone:
Join 25,000+ tech professionals who’ve accelerated their careers with cutting-edge AI skills
25,000+ Professionals Trained
₹23 LPA Average Hike 60% Average Hike
600+ MAANG+ Instructors
Webinar Slot Blocked
Register for our webinar
Learn about hiring processes, interview strategies. Find the best course for you.
ⓘ Used to send reminder for webinar
Time Zone: Asia/Kolkata
Time Zone: Asia/Kolkata
Hands-on AI/ML learning + interview prep to help you win
Explore your personalized path to AI/ML/Gen AI success
The 11 Neural “Power Patterns” For Solving Any FAANG Interview Problem 12.5X Faster Than 99.8% OF Applicants
The 2 “Magic Questions” That Reveal Whether You’re Good Enough To Receive A Lucrative Big Tech Offer
The “Instant Income Multiplier” That 2-3X’s Your Current Tech Salary